Excel is often seen as a versatile tool, accessible for users ranging from beginners to advanced professionals. However, there’s a clear distinction between how Excel is taught on social media and the way it needs to be used in the context of larger business operations, particularly for those at the management level. In this article, we explore this contrast and highlight the need for a more strategic approach to Excel training—one that caters to the needs of those working with complex, enterprise-grade requirements.
The Pyramid of Excel Users
In any given organization, Excel users can be roughly divided into two categories: those at the top of the pyramid—typically managers and business leaders—and those at the bottom—individual contributors or entry-level users. The needs of these two groups are drastically different. Social media and many educational platforms predominantly cater to the vast base of the pyramid, teaching literal, task-based skills such as how to use formulas or format spreadsheets. While these skills are necessary for basic Excel users, they fall short when it comes to solving complex, enterprise-wide challenges.
At the top of the pyramid, where strategic thinking and large-scale decision-making are key, Excel must serve a different purpose. Managers and executives require tools that not only help with day-to-day tasks but also provide insights and support for business goals at a holistic level. To support this, Excel training needs to evolve beyond the surface-level features and address the deeper, more strategic aspects of data management, flow, and analysis.
Literal vs. Lateral Thinking
One of the main barriers to bridging this gap lies in the type of thinking that is emphasized in most Excel training—literal thinking. Literal thinking refers to the straightforward, task-oriented approach where users learn how to interact with Excel’s tools and features in a direct, functional way. This is the type of thinking that dominates social media tutorials and YouTube videos, where creators typically record their screens to show how to execute specific actions in Excel.
The problem with this approach is that it fails to account for the broader, more strategic thinking required in an enterprise context. Lateral thinking, also known as creative or strategic thinking, is essential when addressing complex business problems. Unlike literal thinking, lateral thinking involves seeing the bigger picture, thinking outside the box, and understanding how different parts of a business process fit together to achieve long-term goals.
When you’re working with a large-scale enterprise process, such as budget reviews or financial forecasting, the complexity extends beyond individual tasks. You need to think end-to-end, applying principles that go beyond specific Excel functions. This is where social media-driven, literal-focused tutorials fall short. They might show you how to calculate a sum or create a dynamic array formula, but they won’t teach you how to think strategically about data flow or business processes.
Why Social Media Training Fails for Enterprise Needs
Social media platforms, especially YouTube, thrive on content that is quick, visual, and easy to follow. These videos typically focus on showing the “how” of Excel tasks, often through screen recordings that highlight specific tools or actions. While this type of training can be helpful for basic learning, it lacks the depth required to solve enterprise-level problems.
For example, let’s consider a hypothetical scenario involving two Excel experts who are both recognized for their deep knowledge of the tool. If you were to give them a complex, enterprise-wide challenge—say, a budget review process that requires integrating data from multiple departments—they would likely struggle to solve it using the literal, step-by-step approaches they typically teach. Why? Because solving such a problem requires strategic thinking, understanding of business goals, and the ability to design an end-to-end workflow that can scale and be maintained.
This is the crux of the issue: social media training, which emphasizes literal techniques, doesn’t prepare users to think laterally. And in the world of business, lateral thinking is required to address problems that involve multiple variables, stakeholders, and long-term objectives.
The Importance of Lateral Thinking in Enterprise Processes
To address these challenges, we must begin with the management requirements and work backward. Instead of starting with specific tools or features in Excel, we need to understand the business goals first. From there, we can figure out what is needed to deliver on those goals. This shift in mindset—from task-oriented to goal-oriented thinking—is the first step toward developing enterprise-level solutions in Excel.
For example, in a budget review process, it’s not enough to simply track expenses or calculate totals. You must understand the flow of data, how it interacts across different departments, and how to integrate that information into a cohesive, understandable report for management. This requires a deep understanding of data management principles and the ability to visualize and organize data in a way that aligns with business goals.
When addressing these kinds of challenges, we must think holistically. A simple spreadsheet formula or a specific feature won’t suffice. We need to apply concepts like hub-and-spoke architectures—where data is centralized and flows through various interconnected systems—to ensure that the process is scalable and efficient.
Rethinking Excel Education
Incorporating lateral thinking into Excel training is essential for those in management and strategic roles. Excel training needs to shift away from the focus on individual features and start emphasizing the broader concepts of data flow, business processes, and strategic alignment. This requires a different teaching methodology—one that includes analogies, principles, and the deep dive into concepts that can’t simply be demonstrated on a screen.
A great analogy for this is the difference between a hammer and a screwdriver. While these tools are both used for construction, they serve different purposes. You wouldn’t use a hammer to screw in a nail, just as you wouldn’t use a screwdriver to hammer in a nail. Understanding the fundamental principles behind these tools is key to knowing when and how to use them effectively. Similarly, understanding the principles behind enterprise processes—like data flow, scalability, and reporting—can help Excel users think strategically about their work, rather than just focusing on executing individual tasks.
Conclusion
The gap between how Excel is taught on social media and the needs of those at the top of the organizational pyramid is wide. To serve the strategic needs of business leaders, Excel training must evolve beyond the literal, task-based approach that dominates social media platforms. By embracing lateral thinking and focusing on the big picture—how data flows, how it can be used to support business goals, and how to create scalable, maintainable solutions—we can develop Excel users who are equipped to solve complex, enterprise-level challenges.
This shift in mindset is essential if we are to truly leverage Excel as a powerful tool for business management. It’s time to rethink the way we teach Excel and provide users with the tools to think creatively, strategically, and holistically. Only then can we bridge the gap between the basics and the business needs of tomorrow’s leaders.
Add comment